Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20191030063209.mr2ksylefsrcbu6z@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line
Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2019-10-29 16:31:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > one of the most frequent conflicts I see is that two patches add files > > to OBJS (or one of its other spellings), and there are conflicts because > > another file has been added. > > ... > > Now, obviously these types of conflicts are easy enough to resolve, but > > it's still annoying. It seems that this would be substantially less > > often a problem if we just split such lines to one file per > > line. > > We did something similar not too long ago in configure.in (bfa6c5a0c), > and it seems to have helped. +1 Cool. Any opinion on whether to got for OBJS = \ dest.o \ fastpath.o \ ... or OBJS = dest.o \ fastpath.o \ ... I'm mildly inclined to go for the former. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: