Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20191004214300.pqe7fruaemklz5qn@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16036: Segmentation fault while doing an update
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, Thanks again for the bug report! I've pushed the fix, and tests. They'll be included in 12.1 (which I assume will happen relatively soon), or you can compile a slightly newer version yourself. Regards, Andres On 2019-10-04 12:28:48 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2019-10-03 21:30:21 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > Here's 1, 2 & 4, working on fixing 3). While we now have OK-ish > > coverage for nodeModifyTable.c and nodeLockRows.c triggered EPQ, there's > > not much for the trigger case. > Here's both the fix and tests. > > I think the test adds a good bit coverage. What's lacking is primarily > testing foreign table related paths, but that seems separate enough, and > would need to be done in a separate contrib/ test anyway. > > I think there's a good case to be made to backpatch the tests further > than 12, but I'm not sure about it? They do pass (with one error message > about a failure to delete changed to a failure to update, we didn't use > to be able to discern) back to 9.6, requiring I did push the tests back to 9.6. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: