Re: Online checksums patch - once again

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:49:44PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:03:20PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Other than bots, this patch doesn't seem to have attracted any reviewers
> > > this time around.  Perhaps you need to bribe someone?  (Maybe "how sad
> > > your committer SSH key stopped working" would do?)
> > > 
> > 
> > Hmm. I don't think that's a bribe, that's a threat. However, maybe it will
> > work.
> > 
> 
> IMHO the patch is ready to go - I think the global barrier solves the
> issue in the previous version, and that's the only problem I'm aware of.
> So +1 from me to go ahead and push it.
> 
> And now please uncomment my commit SSH key again, please ;-)

For adding cluster-level encryption to Postgres, the plan is to create a
standby that has encryption enabled, then switchover to it.  Is that a
method we support now for adding checksums to Postgres?  Do we need the
ability to do it in-place too?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +