Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres?
От | raf |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190930030555.souzqyifygxned44@raf.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Redis 16 times faster than Postgres? (Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Steve Litt wrote: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:46:14 +1000 > Nathan Woodrow <madmanwoo@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Redis is a in memory database so I would except it to be always much > > faster.. > > Is there a way to have Redis periodically update an on-disk backup? > That would be great, but otherwise you're at the mercy of your power > company (here in Central Florida it's routine for power to go down and > stay down for five hours). > > SteveT > > Steve Litt > Author: The Key to Everyday Excellence > http://www.troubleshooters.com/key > Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt i don't know but voltdb, another in-memory database, replicates to other instances which can be in different geographical locations and so not prone to a single power failure. perhaps all in-memory databases are aware of the need for this. cheers, raf
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: