On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:39:27AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The "connection_name" parameter's explanation is not in Parameters
> section.
> Instead of it, "connection_object" parameter is in Parameters section. Its
> explanation seems about "connection_name".
> Is it typo about "connection_name" in Synopsis section, or
> "connection_object" in Parameters section?
Good catch. If you look at the code (ecpg.trailer), connection_object
refers to the name of the parameter, while connection_name refers to
"AS connection_object" as a whole. So it seems to me that the
intention is to use connection_object in the synopsis of the docs.
Any thoughts from others?
--
Michael