Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190913125130.GA7078@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Speedup truncates of relation forks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Sep-13, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:52 PM Jamison, Kirk <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > Please add a preliminary patch that removes the function. Dead code is good, > > > as long as it is gone. We can get it pushed ahead of the rest of this. > > > > Alright. I've attached a separate patch removing the smgrdounlinkfork. > > Per the past discussion, some people want to keep this "dead" function > for some reasons. So, in my opinion, it's better to just enclose the function > with #if NOT_USED and #endif, to keep the function itself as it is, and then > to start new discussion on hackers about the removal of that separatedly > from this patch. I searched for anybody requesting to keep the function. I couldn't find anything. Tom said in 2012: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1471.1339106082@sss.pgh.pa.us > As committed, the smgrdounlinkfork case is actually dead code; it's > never called from anywhere. I left it in place just in case we want > it someday. but if no use has appeared in 7 years, I say it's time to kill it. In absence of objections, I'll commit a patch to remove it later today. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: