Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190820043445.GA15766@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps
Re: Cleanup isolation specs from unused steps |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Aug-20, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:23:19AM -0700, Melanie Plageman wrote: > > Could you do the check that all steps have been used in dry_run mode > > instead of when running the tests for real? > > Sure, I was hesitating to do so. I have no issue in moving the check > into run_testspec(). So done as attached. I created the dry-run mode to be able to easily generate the set of possible permutations for a new test, then edit the result and put it back in the spec file; but after the deadlock tests were added (with necessary hacking of the lock-detection in isolationtester) that manner of operation became almost completely useless. Maybe we need to rethink what facilities isolationtester offers -- possibly making dry-run have a completely different behavior than currently, which I doubt anybody is using. All that being said, I have no objections to this patch (but I didn't review it closely). -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: