Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logicaldecoding client after creating a slot
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logicaldecoding client after creating a slot |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190709214630.GA15632@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logicaldecoding client after creating a slot (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logicaldecoding client after creating a slot
Re: BUG #15888: Bogus "idle in transaction" state for logicaldecoding client after creating a slot |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2019-Jul-09, Andres Freund wrote: > The problem doesn't exist in later versions, because there > exec_replication_command() does an explicit > /* Report to pgstat that this process is now idle */ > pgstat_report_activity(STATE_IDLE, NULL); > That's due to > > commit d02974e32e028fc078d8f5eca1d6a4516efb0aa6 > Author: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> > Date: 2017-12-29 16:19:51 +0100 > > Properly set base backup backends to active in pg_stat_activity > > which is post 9.6. Not sure I really feel a huge appetite for whacking > this around in the back branches. Hmm ... so what that commit did is precisely to fix this bug. Magnus thought at the time he was fixing a pg10 bug, https://postgr.es/m/CABUevEwX4g8y=gmgfPzxFKS7gqjSYNR949Xc96OQm=YXJmh_Og@mail.gmail.com but apparently now we see that the bug was older than that. Maybe it's okay to backpatch further? (Booh to missing "Discussion:" tags in commit messages) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: