Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190518023017.nkucoc5xgoebtvfw@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 12: Feature Highlights
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 01:38:49PM +1200, David Rowley wrote: > On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 03:36, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > Yes, it does. I added this text and moved the commit item: > > > > Avoid sorting when partitions are already being scanned in the > > necessary order (David Rowley) > > Thank you for moving that out. > > > I certainly strugged to understand the maze of commits related to > > partitioning. > > With the utmost respect, because I certainly do appreciate the work > you did on the release note, I think if that's the case, then it > should only make you more willing to listen to the advice from the > people who are closer to those commits. However I understand that > consistency is also important, so listening to the heckling of > individuals sometimes won't lead to a good overall outcome. That > being said, I don't think that's what happened here, as most of the > people who had a gripe about it were pretty close to the work that was > done. > > FWIW, I do think the release notes should be meant as a source of > information which give a brief view on changes made that have a > reasonable possibility of affecting people (either negative or > positively) who are upgrading. Leaving out important details because > they might confuse a small group of people seems wrong-headed, as it > means the people who are not in that group are left to look at the > commit history to determine what's changed, or worse, they might just > assume that the thing has not changed which could either cause them to > 1) Skip the upgrade because it's not interesting to them, or; 2) > having something break because we didn't list some incompatibility. > I know you know better than most people that extracting a useful > summary from the commit history is a pretty mammoth task, so I doubt > we should put that upon the masses. No one has suggested new wording, so I don't know what you are complaining about. In fact, the wording we have now is by Amit Langote. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: