Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190430030342.jmbgnih4q3cdoufz@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since9.6 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: REINDEX INDEX results in a crash for an index of pg_class since 9.6
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2019-04-29 15:09:24 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2019-04-29 18:07:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I wrote: > > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > >> Taking this as a WIP, what do you think? > > > > > Seems generally about right. > > > > Andres, are you pushing this forward? Next week's minor releases > > are coming up fast, and we're going to need to adapt the HEAD patch > > significantly for the back branches AFAICS. So there's little time > > to spare. > > Yea. I'm testing the backbranch'd bits (much simpler) and writing the > commit message atm. I've pushed the master bits, and the other branches are running check-world right now and I'll push soon unless something breaks (it's a bit annoying that <= 9.6 can't run check-world in parallel...). Turns out, I was confused, and there wasn't much pre-existing breakage in RelationSetNewRelfilenode() (I guess I must have been thinking of ATExecSetTableSpace?). That part was broken in d25f519107, I should have caught this while reviewing and signficantly evolving the code in that commit, mea culpa. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: