Re: [patch] pg_test_timing does not prompt illegal option
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] pg_test_timing does not prompt illegal option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190417160517.nfsqzvst42m2assm@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch] pg_test_timing does not prompt illegal option (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:24:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 6:21 PM Zhang, Jie <zhangjie2@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> I think "--" is a illegal option, errors should be prompted. > > > This is not the problem only for pg_test_timing. If you want to > > address this, the patch needs to cover all the client commands > > like psql, createuser. I'm not sure if it's worth doing that. > > I think it might be an actively bad idea. There's a pretty > widespread convention that "--" is a no-op switch indicating > the end of switches. At least some of our tools appear to > honor that behavior (probably because glibc's getopt_long > does; I do not think we are implementing it ourselves). Yep, a simple 'ls' on Debian stretch shows it is a common convention: $ ls -- file1 file2 FYI, 'gcc --' (using Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) does throw an error, so it is inconsistent. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: