Re: BUG #15726: parallel queries failed ERROR: invalid name syntaxCONTEXT: parallel worker

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:04:14AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The extra appearance of "parallel worker" seems a bit redundant,
> though I don't know if we can get rid of it.
>
> Could we at least be consistent about whether the context is
> "parallel worker" or "parallel worker process"?

Indeed.  My vote would be to back-patch that stuff.
--
Michael