Re: allow online change primary_conninfo

On 2019-04-04 11:06:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:27:55AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> > Not agree. Latest patch version perform walreceiver restart without
> > switch to a different method as discussed. Here is no race condition
> > between startup process and walreceiver because conninfo passed via
> > WalRcvData struct as currently. I miss something important? 
> > Michael Paquier had no possibility to review latest implementation,
> > but did not say this is totally wrong, just asked wait a rather
> > close lookup.
> 
> I agree with Sergei's statement here.  He has sent a patch for review,
> which I have looked up a bit, but not enough to provide a full review
> unfortunately, and this even if I was listed as a reviewer of it.  So
> if somebody is to blame here, that's me.

> > Of cource we can close this cf entry. I would be happy if someone
> > else post proper implementation. And I can rework my implementation
> > again, but I don’t know how the correct implementation should look
> > or why latest implementation is wrong. 
> 
> Moving this patch to next CF is fine.

Cool, sorry for the misunderstanding then.