Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it wasalready committed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190402171714.6mlldbvm32w727lk@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15727: PANIC: cannot abort transaction 295144144, it was already committed
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, On 2019-04-02 13:13:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > FWIW, I see six potential candidates, not two: > > pgsql/src/backend/commands/trigger.c: 3380: elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status: %u", test); > pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeLockRows.c: 232: elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status: %u", > pgsql/src/backend/executor/execReplication.c: 211: elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status: %u",res); > pgsql/src/backend/executor/execReplication.c: 375: elog(ERROR, "unexpected table_lock_tuple status: %u",res); These have an explicit case / separate error for TM_Invisible (= 1 - which is the status we're seeing according to the error message) though. So afaict they can't be relevant here. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: