Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20190319165557.w2kmnhlzdnispxvu@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Willing to fix a PQexec() in libpq module
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2019-03-19 12:51:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > > I think the answer is "no," and we should deprecate this misfeature. > > It's bad enough that we'll be supporting it for five years after > > deprecating it, but it's worse to leave it hanging around our necks > > forever. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albatross_(metaphor) > > The problem with that approach is that not everybody agrees that > it's a misfeature. Yea, it's extremely useful to just be able to send a whole script to the server. Otherwise every application wanting to do so needs to be able to split SQL statements, not exactly a trivial task. And the result will be slower, due to increased rountrips. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: