Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190318204235.GA30360@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs (Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: partitioned tables referenced by FKs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Jesper On 2019-Mar-01, Jesper Pedersen wrote: > I'm getting a failure in the pg_upgrade test: > > -- > +-- Name: pk5 pk5_pkey; Type: CONSTRAINT; Schema: regress_fk; Owner: > jpedersen > +-- > + > +ALTER TABLE ONLY regress_fk.pk5 > + ADD CONSTRAINT pk5_pkey PRIMARY KEY (a); > + > + > +-- > > when running check-world. So I tested this case just now (after fixing a couple of bugs) and see a slightly different problem now: those excess lines are actually just that pg_dump chose to print the constraints in different order, as there are identical lines with "-" in the diff I get. The databases actually *are* identical as far as I can tell. I haven't yet figured out how to fix this; of course, the easiest solution is to just drop the regress_fk schema at the end of the foreign_key.sql regression test, but I would prefer a different solution. I'm going to post the new version of the patch separately. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: