Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
От | Shawn Debnath |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190313010007.GB8301@f01898859afd.ant.amazon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:11:51PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 6:16 AM Shawn Debnath <sdn@amazon.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:53:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > > > > Why do we need to include fmgr.h in md.h? > > > > > > More generally, any massive increase in an include file's inclusions > > > is probably a sign that you need to refactor. Cross-header inclusions > > > are best avoided altogether if you can --- obviously that's not always > > > possible, but we should minimize them. We've had some very unfortunate > > > problems in the past from indiscriminate #includes in headers. > > > > Agree - I do pay attention to these, but this one slipped through the > > cracks (copied smgr.h then edited to remove smgr bits). Thanks for > > catching this, will fix in the next patch iteration. > > Huh... so why it was in smgr.h then? Seems bogus. Fix pushed to master. So ... wondering if there are any other left over items for this patch or is it good to go? I imagine there's at least a couple of us who would love to see this get in for PG12. Thanks! -- Shawn Debnath Amazon Web Services (AWS)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: