Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190308150318.GA8681@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11 (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update does not move row across foreign partitions in v11
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Mar-08, Amit Langote wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:09 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I'm not sure about copying the same to ddl.sgml. Why is that needed? > > Update is not DDL. > > Hmm, maybe because there's already a huge block of text describing > certain limitations of UPDATE row movement under concurrency? Uh, you're right, there is. That seems misplaced :-( I'm not sure it even counts as a "limitation"; it seems to belong to the NOTES section of UPDATE rather than where it is now. > Actually, I remember commenting *against* having that text in > ddl.sgml, but it got in there anyway. We can move it now ... > > ddl.sgml does say this: "Partitions can also be > > foreign tables, although they have some limitations that normal tables > > do not; see CREATE FOREIGN TABLE for more information." which suggests > > that the limitation might need to be added to create_foreign_table.sgml. > > Actually, that "more information" never got added to > create_foreign_table.sgml. There should've been some text about the > lack for tuple routing at least in PG 10's docs, but I guess that > never happened. Sigh. Since version 10 is going to be supported for a few years still, maybe we should add it there. > Should we start now by listing this UPDATE row movement limitation? I think we should, yes. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: