Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
От | Shawn Debnath |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190305171557.GA30015@f01898859afd.ant.amazon.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:53:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > > +#include "fmgr.h" > > +#include "storage/block.h" > > +#include "storage/relfilenode.h" > > +#include "storage/smgr.h" > > +#include "storage/sync.h" > > > Why do we need to include fmgr.h in md.h? > > More generally, any massive increase in an include file's inclusions > is probably a sign that you need to refactor. Cross-header inclusions > are best avoided altogether if you can --- obviously that's not always > possible, but we should minimize them. We've had some very unfortunate > problems in the past from indiscriminate #includes in headers. Agree - I do pay attention to these, but this one slipped through the cracks (copied smgr.h then edited to remove smgr bits). Thanks for catching this, will fix in the next patch iteration. -- Shawn Debnath Amazon Web Services (AWS)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: