Re: reducing isolation tests runtime
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20190213174650.3bjgfzjcnw3ys5ab@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: reducing isolation tests runtime
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2019-02-13 12:41:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > Do you have an idea why we have both max_concurrent_tests *and* > > max_connections in pg_regress? ISTM the former isn't really useful given > > the latter? > > No, the former is a static restriction on what the schedule file is > allowed to contain, the latter is a dynamic restriction (that typically > is unlimited anyway). Right, but why don't we allow for more tests in a group, and then use a default max_connections to limit concurrency? Having larger groups is advantageous wrt test runtime - it reduces the number of artificial serialization point where the slowest test slows things down. Obviously there's still a few groups that are needed for test interdependency management, but that's comparatively rare. We have have plenty groups that are just broken up to stay below max_concurrent_tests. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: