Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201902010958.cf2cbi3d2ule@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb ("Jamison, Kirk" <k.jamison@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade: Pass -j down to vacuumdb
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Feb-01, Jamison, Kirk wrote: > I'm not sure if misunderstood the purpose of $VACUUMDB_OPTS. I thought what > the other developers suggested is to utilize it so that --jobs for vacuumdb > would be optional and just based from user-specified option $VACUUMDB_OPTS. > By which it would not utilize the amount of jobs used for pg_upgrade. > To address your need of needing a parallel, the script would just then > suggest if the user wants a --jobs option. The if/else for number of jobs is > not needed in that case, maybe only for ifndef WIN32 else case. No Kirk, you got it right -- (some of) those ifdefs are not needed, as adding the --jobs in the command line is not needed. I do think some extra whitespace in the format string is needed. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: