Re: Bison state table

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 05:38:59PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> With our scanner keywords list now more cache-aware, and with us
> planning to use Bison for years to come, has anyone ever looked at
> reordering the bison state machine array to be more cache aware, e.g.,
> having common states next to each other rather than scattered around the
> array?

Do we have a pretty good idea of what commonly grouped states are, or
at least a way to get some not-awful estimates of what they are?

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate