Re: Acceptable/Best formatting of callbacks (for pluggable storage)

Hi,

On 2019-01-11 09:42:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > The pluggable storage patchset has a large struct full of callbacks, and
> > a bunch of wrapper functions for calling those callbacks. While
> > starting to polish the patchset, I tried to make the formatting nice.
> > ...
> > So, putting the parameter list, both in use and declaration, entirely
> > into a new line yields decent formatting with pgindent. But it's kinda
> > weird.  I can't really come up with a better alternative, and after a
> > few minutes it looks pretty reasonable.
> 
> > Comments? Better alternatives?
> 
> Use shorter method names?  This sounds like an ugly workaround for
> a carpal-tunnel-syndrome-inducing design.

I'm confused. What did I write about that has unreasonably long names?
And if you're referring to the wider design, that all seems fairly
fundamental to something needing callbacks - not exactly a first in
postgres.

Greetings,

Andres Freund