Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writablevariables) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 201901091953.p3k2mqdwq5jk@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Jan-09, Tom Lane wrote: > We could make the index table still smaller if we wanted to reassign > a couple dozen high-numbered functions down to lower OIDs, but I dunno > if it's worth the trouble. It certainly isn't from a performance > standpoint, because those unused entry ranges will never be touched > in normal usage; but it'd make the server executable a couple KB smaller. Or two couples KB smaller, if we abandoned the idea that pg_proc OIDs must not collide with those in any other catalog, and we renumbered all functions to start at OID 1 or so. duplicate_oids would complain about that, though, I suppose ... and nobody who has ever hardcoded a function OID would love this idea much. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: