Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181220205802.kws4rj67albfcroc@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for this work! I like the name "partition directory". On 2018-Dec-20, Robert Haas wrote: > 0002 introduces the concept of a partition directory. The idea is > that the planner will create a partition directory, and so will the > executor, and all calls which occur in those places to > RelationGetPartitionDesc() will instead call > PartitionDirectoryLookup(). Every lookup for the same relation in the > same partition directory is guaranteed to produce the same answer. I > believe this patch still has a number of weaknesses. More on that > below. The commit message for this one also points out another potential problem, > Introduce the concept of a partition directory. > > Teach the optimizer and executor to use it, so that a single planning > cycle or query execution gets the same PartitionDesc for the same table > every time it looks it up. This does not prevent changes between > planning and execution, nor does it guarantee that all tables are > expanded according to the same snapshot. Namely: how does this handle the case of partition pruning structure being passed from planner to executor, if an attach happens in the middle of it and puts a partition in between existing partitions? Array indexes of any partitions that appear later in the partition descriptor will change. This is the reason I used the query snapshot rather than EState. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: