Re: removal of dangling temp tables
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: removal of dangling temp tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181214172658.3b7esbo3dm3gputq@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: removal of dangling temp tables (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: removal of dangling temp tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Dec-14, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:29 AM Alvaro Herrera > <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > I think the best way to fix this is to call RemoveTempRelations() > > unconditionally at session start (without doing the rest of the temp > > table setup, just the removal.) > > That would certainly simplify things. I think I thought about that as > far back as a734fd5d1c309cc553b7c8c79fba96218af090f7 but it seemed > like a significant behavior change and I wasn't sure that everyone > would like it. In particular, it adds overhead to backend startup > that, in the case of a large temp schema, could be fairly long. Hmm, I think in the case covered by your commit, that is a session that crashes with a few thousands of temp tables, this new patch might cause a failure to open a new session altogether. Maybe it'd be better to change temp table removal to always drop max_locks_per_transaction objects at a time (ie. commit/start a new transaction every so many objects). -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: