Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLockbuffer_content lock
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLockbuffer_content lock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181204170104.kh3rnocd7tz7ntpz@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLockbuffer_content lock (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Connections hang indefinitely while taking a gin index's LWLockbuffer_content lock
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2018-11-10 17:42:16 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:46 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > Teodor: Do you think that the issue is fixable? It looks like there > > are serious issues with the design of 218f51584d5 to me. I don't think > > the general "there can't be any inserters at this subtree" thing works > > given that we have to couple buffer locks when moving right for other > > reasons. We call ginStepRight() within ginFinishSplit(), for reasons > > that date back to bug fix commit ac4ab97e from 2013 -- that detail is > > probably important, because it seems to be what breaks the subtree > > design (we don't delete in two phases or anything in GIN). > > Ping? > > This is a thorny problem, and I'd like to get your input soon. I > suspect that reverting 218f51584d5 may be the ultimate outcome, even > though it's a v10 feature. Teodor, any chance for a response here? It's not OK to commit something and then just not respond to bug-reports, especially when they're well diagnose and clearly point towards issues in a commit of yours. Alexander, CCing you, perhaps you could point the thread out to Teodor? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: