Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181204094418.wpr6mxrtsuxb5mlq@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition
Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
After reading this thread, I think I like WHERE better than FILTER. Tally: WHERE: Adam Berlin, Lim Myungkyu, Dean Rasheed, yours truly FILTER: Tomas Vondra, Surafel Temesgen Couldn't find others expressing an opinion in this regard. On 2018-Nov-30, Tomas Vondra wrote: > I think it should be enough just to switch to CIM_SINGLE and increment the > command counter after each inserted row. Do we apply command counter increment per row with some other COPY option? Per-row CCI makes me a bit uncomfortable because with you'd get in trouble with a large copy. I think it's particularly nasty here, precisely because you may want to filter out some rows of a very large file, and the CCI may prevent that from working. I'm not convinced by the example case of reading how many tuples you've imported so far in the WHERE/WHEN/FILTER clause each time (that'd become incrementally slower as it progresses). -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: