Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal"
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal" |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20181129215644.f6kzxzj4x52pb3vq@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal" (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Change "checkpoint starting" message to use "wal"
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Nov-29, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 4:10 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > There's hundreds of other internal uses of xlog that were not touched > > > either, only the user-facing parts were changed. > > > > I have heard of them ;) > > Just wondering if this one is worth renaming as the variable is > > isolated. It is not a big deal to do nothing though. > > Well, if we rename the user-visible part but not the internal part, > then they don't match, which is odd. But we already did that when we renamed all the xlog to WAL terminology ... why do we care about it now particularly? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: