Re: pgsql: Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole andregnamesp
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole andregnamesp |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181127063226.mpyijg3jwrmmm3rr@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole and regnamesp (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole andregnamesp
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Hi, On 2018-11-27 00:43:43 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > Update pg_upgrade test for reg* to include regrole and regnamespace. > > This has broken all the back-branch cross-version upgrade tests, Hm, darn it. Gotta rewrite the query to reference those new types without the regtype casts (as to_regtype without errors doesn't exist far enough back). Seems easier than having a version check for the different types. > to go along with the HEAD cases you already broke :-( The cross-version bug around pg_largeobject_metadata ought to be fixed now. I'm hoping for a response by Andrew about the ordering bit, you're welcome to opine on that too. I see that prairiedog https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2018-11-27%2005%3A30%3A39 failed just it's last run, but I'm not clear whether that's just a random failure, or something I can't don't recognize without further information. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: