Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Section 26.2.1. Planning wording |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20181127015443.GB16835@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Section 26.2.1. Planning wording (Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>) |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:38:02AM +0200, Theo Kramer wrote: > Section 26.2.1. Planning wording includes the following > > "In any case the hardware architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work." > > would be more correct if it read as follows > > "In any case the CPU architecture must be the same — shipping from, say, a 32-bit to a 64-bit system will not work." > > as “hardware architecture” would imply the difference between say Dell and IBM which should be ok if the CPU is the samearchitecture ... I feel we might have cases where differences beyond the CPU might matter, though I can't think of any now. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: