Re: Constraint documentation
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Constraint documentation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181126154320.5h3xuatfzgmzmcgp@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Constraint documentation (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Constraint documentation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I have pushed this. On 2018-Nov-26, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 03:16:11PM +0100, Patrick Francelle wrote: > > > To address your remark, I added a small message in the CREATE TABLE > > reference page to be more explicit about the topic, so that it would be > > a warning for the users reading the section. And then a reference to the > > CHECK constraint page where the full explanation is to be located. > > > > That way, the caveat is mentioned in both pages, but the full > > explanation is located only on a single page. That was a good idea, but your third sentence repeated what was being said in the first sentence in the same paragraph. I edited that to put the cross-reference next to the first sentence instead. > I believe that features F671 (subqueries in CHECK constraints) and > possibly F673 (reads SQL-data routine invocations in CHECK > constraints) from the standard should be referred to here. > > We haven't implemented either one of them, but we might some day. I don't necessarily disagree, but I don't think we put many feature references in the docs. I suppose we can edit it when we implement F671 and F673. Or maybe you want to submit a followup patch. It didn't seem worth blocking this patch for your proposed change (particularly since Lætitia seems to have given up on it already). Thanks, -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: