Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181119223804.pdohxdemtpuxctzq@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2018-11-19 17:32:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > FWIW, it seems that gcc's trunk works again. But I'm not sure this isn't > > just an accident and the optimization's introduced in the above revision > > aren't still broken. > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=moonjelly&br=HEAD > > Yeah, I saw that moonjelly had gone green. Are you going to update > serinus' compiler soon? I'm using debian's gcc-snapshot package, which updates a bit less frequently than what Fabien does. It'll auto-update as soon as that has happened. What disconcerts me a bit is that afaict there wasn't an intentional fix in the relevant area (disabling value range propagation fixes the miscompilation), so I'm not quite sure. > (And while I'm bugging you, would you fix your buildfarm menagerie > to build REL_11_STABLE?) Oh, hum. I thought I had. But I did it only for the LLVM enabled animals. Results should be coming up soon. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: