Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181119141907.jfoa76ikca7hzg56@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Nov-19, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 11/17/18 4:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Here are versions for branches 10 and 11. The main change is that the > > COPY test didn't have the partitioned table, because it was recently > > introduced (0d5f05cde011) so I backpatched that part also. It's a bit > > useless, but I'd rather backpatch the same thing rather than have > > different lines there ... > > The patch seems fine to me. Pushed now, thanks. > It's a bit unfortunate that we simply disable the optimization on > partitioned tables instead of fixing it somehow, but I guess it's better > than nothing and no one has a very good idea how to make it work. Yeah, I think leaving it in the current state is worse than disabling it, since an error is thrown anyway. In any case, I guess when we have a patch it won't be backpatchable. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: