Re: pg11.1 jit segv
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg11.1 jit segv |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181115224755.drq5x6wpw5rjxfj7@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg11.1 jit segv (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg11.1 jit segv
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2018-11-15 16:39:59 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Crash is reproducible but only when JIT=on. > > postgresql11-llvmjit-11.1-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64 > > [2769871.453033] postmaster[8582]: segfault at 7f083bddb780 ip 00007f08127e814e sp 00007ffe463506e0 error 4 > [2770774.470600] postmaster[29410]: segfault at 7f0812eeb6c8 ip 00007f08127eb4f0 sp 00007ffe463506e0 error 4 > > Core was generated by `postgres: telsasoft ts 192.168.122.11(41908) SELECT '. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Thanks for reporting! > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007f08127e814e in ?? () > #1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () Could you enable jit_debugging_support and reproduce? That should give a more useful backtrace. It'd also be interesting if toggling jit_inline_above_cost=-1, jit_optimize_above_cost=-1 and jit_tuple_deforming=false, each set individually, make a difference. > Let me know if there's anything else I can provide. Any way for me to reproduce this locally? I.e. can you narrow this down to a reproducible test case? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: