Re: BUG #15114: logical decoding Segmentation fault
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15114: logical decoding Segmentation fault |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181030230931.22pms35u3sqx4i7c@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15114: logical decoding Segmentation fault (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15114: logical decoding Segmentation fault
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2018-10-31 08:07:36 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 08:45:57AM +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > The receiver side *should* actually use RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap, the > > problem there seems to be rather than we setup snapshot few lines of > > code too late in worker.c. > > Does the worker need this much information though? It just needs to > know about the replication index itself and its columns, not about all > the other indexes. It may make sense to unify both code paths to behave > similarly. Replication needs to maintain the other indexes, and for that it needs to evaluate predicates. So I don't understand how you could say that it doesn't need to know about other indexes? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: