Re: Remove stickiness from navigation bar in docs
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove stickiness from navigation bar in docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181022181105.xllqrvx6itopfcvj@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove stickiness from navigation bar in docs (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove stickiness from navigation bar in docs
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Hi, On 2018-10-22 13:07:47 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Oct-19, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > > > On 10/19/18 5:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > > > You're quoting me saying things about the shout box - but I think you're > > > talking about the fixed navbar? > > > > Probably. But I do think we should have the shoutbox there both for > > consistency and the fact the majority of our traffic goes to the docs. > > The shoutbox does provide a reference for when a new release comes out, > > and if vast majority of people are going to pg.org to view our docs, it > > provides a nice place to let people know when there are updates. > > I too think the doc pages could stand some additional improvement. I'm > okay with seeing the shoutbox the first dozen pages I visit, but after > that it's annoying, and by the hundredth time I see it it becomes > infuriating. Why can't I dismiss it? Yea. > As for the list of unsupported versions, I'm not sure that its > omnipresence has a lot of value. Would it work to have a list of > supported versions plus devel (one line -- we could say "Current (11), > 10 / 9.6 / 9.5 / 9.4 / 9.3 / 12dev" since it should be pretty obvious > that "12dev" is development), and have a link "other versions" that > shows the rest of the list? Yea, if it's one line (current choices + dev) with a + or such that expands to a list of the old versions, it'd be much better than it's now. I also wonder why we need to have two search boxes on every page. Can't we have one where there's a selector for 'docs' and 'whole site'? I never use the search (grepping sgml is more efficient & accurate), but I can see why we'd want to offer that. But two boxes seems superfluous. We currently reference the version we're on two times in as many lines. Looking at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/intro-whatis.html - "Documentation → PostgreSQL devel (2018-10-22 16:17:03)" - underlined "devel" Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: