Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20181011163952.emtpcrzkpselhupj@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Soon-to-be-broken regression test case (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Soon-to-be-broken regression test case
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Oct-11, Tom Lane wrote: > I have been fooling around with a patch to allow pull-up of sub-selects > that lack any FROM, along the lines discussed in > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/15944.1521127664@sss.pgh.pa.us > I find that it is smart enough to reduce that EXISTS to a plain > expression, yielding > > QUERY PLAN > ---------------------------------------------------- > Subquery Scan on tenk1_vw_sec > -> Index Only Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 > Index Cond: (unique1 = 0) > (3 rows) Hmm, I have the feeling that this would nullify some tests in partition_prune also, which IIRC pretend to invoke runtime pruning with things like "WHERE partcol = (select 1)". -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: