Re: BUG #15402: Hot standby server with archive_mode=on keepsinitial WAL segments
От | TAKATSUKA Haruka |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15402: Hot standby server with archive_mode=on keepsinitial WAL segments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180926133640.99bfbc7ea82f71aa91a02c11@sraoss.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15402: Hot standby server with archive_mode=on keepsinitial WAL segments (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15402: Hot standby server with archive_mode=on keepsinitial WAL segments
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hello Michael, Firstly, I will tell the reproduce steps. On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 12:52:05 +0900 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 03:26:50AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > A hot standby server with “archive_mode = on” keeps initial WAL segment > > files that copied by pg_basebackup. It shows the following status. > > 000000010000000000000042 will be kept forever in this case. > > How did you find yourself in this situation? Did you take a base backup > from a primary which had .ready files in it, and those got copied to the > standby's data folder? We may want to study the possibility of > filtering things when taking a base backup instead. I can reproduce it by this steps. $ pg_basebackup -D data_standby -R -Xs $ pg_ctl start -D data_standby -o '-p 5433' $ pgbench -i ; pgbench -i ; pgbench -i $ psql -c 'checkpoint' ; psql -p 5433 -c 'checkpoint' $ ls data_standby/pg_wal ; ls data_standby/pg_wal/archive_status/ postgresql.conf: archive_mode = on archive_command = 'cp %p /tmp/arc/%f' max_wal_size = 160MB There are no .ready files right after pg_basebackup. It will be generated after the replication starts. Thnaks, Haruka Takatsuka > > Though I understand renaming the .ready to .done manually can clean it, > > I would like to fix the server code like the following patch. > > I'd appreciate if you would consider that. > > Your patch looks incorrect to me to begin with... What if archive_mode > is switched from "on" to "always" back-and-forth and there some of the > past segments which should be archived are not? > -- > Michael
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: