Re: Ambiguity in restore_command for recovery.conf
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ambiguity in restore_command for recovery.conf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180919024250.GE1650@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Ambiguity in restore_command for recovery.conf (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 04:10:17PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > Documentation for restore_command in recovery.conf only says, "This > parameter is required for archive recovery, but optional for streaming > replication," but it doesn't say specifically when the restore_command > string will be used and why. My guess is that as long as the WAL files > are still available on the master (primary) host, the recovery will > fetch them via the replication slot, but if a WAL is missing on the > primary, only then will the restore_command be used. But this isn't > explicitly stated. It could be that the restore_command is always > used, even if the WAL file is still available on the primary. The logic around the source used to fetch WAL segments is defined in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable/xlog.c. A standby would give priority to what is present in the local pg_wal or in the WAL archive before switching to streaming. If fetching a segment from the archive or the local pg_wal fails, then a switch to streaming happens (of course if primary_conninfo is defined). There is nothing really linked to replication slots in this case. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: