Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180903142132.oo3pekbn7sph7igz@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Sep-01, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > If -P was forgotten and pg_verify_checksums operates on a large cluster, > > the caller can send SIGUSR1 to pg_verify_checksums to turn progress > > status reporting on during runtime. > > Hmmm. I cannot say I like the signal feature much. Would it make sense for > the progress to be on by default, and to have a quiet option instead? Hmm, I recall this technique being used elsewhere and is sometimes useful. Can't remember where though -- by manpages, it's not rsync nor pv ... How about making it a toggle? Default off, enable-able by option, toggleable by signal. (If you enable it via the signal, what's the rate to report at?) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: