Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c

On 2018-Aug-15, Robert Haas wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I'm almost tempted to think that the reasons above make this a
> > back-patchable bug fix.  Comments?
> 
> No objections to changing the behavior.  Have you checked whether
> there are any noticeable performance consequences?
> 
> Back-patching seems a bit aggressive to me considering that the danger
> is hypothetical.

That was my first thought too, and my preferred path would be to make
this master-only and only consider a backpatch later if we find some
practical reason to do so.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services