Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180809.131131.56722332.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello. At Fri, 3 Aug 2018 15:42:22 -0700, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote in <CAH2-WzmXcHXa0MKx5a9NiaaCOE4E4T_rnaHa-N4gN-VoWUT8aw@mail.gmail.com> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >> I reread through the thread and IUCC, drop_index() is sending > >> inval on the owing relation and invalidation happens (that is, > > > > I finally understand that I was totally inept. This came from > > *the result* of the original -bug thread. > > I certainly would not say that you were in any way inept. Perhaps > there is an argument for *also* doing what you propose. I am not > dismissive of your idea. I jumped to the URL to see the thread but it was not up-to-date. It's the cause of my confusion that I thought the problem was the error seen *after* the invalidation fix patch in my repo. > It seems like a question that should be considered separately, on > another thread. If you still want to pursue it. Thanks. I might bring this again later. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: