Re: BUG #15304: Problem when replicating Floating point timestampsto int64 timestamps
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15304: Problem when replicating Floating point timestampsto int64 timestamps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180727174021.n2r3cweflwn3ip4j@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #15304: Problem when replicating Floating point timestamps toint64 timestamps (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15304: Problem when replicating Floating point timestamps toint64 timestamps
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2018-Jul-27, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > While testing a migration procedure on a database (v9.6.9) from floating > point datetimes to int64 (v9.6.9) using pglogical i saw that after the > initial data sync all the subsequent replicated rows containing dates are > getting nonsensical datetime values in the subscriber. > I've read: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/26788.1487455319%40sss.pgh.pa.us#26788.1487455319@sss.pgh.pa.us > So I know that this is not something new, but i was wondering if there is > any way around this, As I recall, pglogical has a way to indicate transmission of data using the text representation rather than binary, which should fix this problem. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: