Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbenchread-write tests.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbenchread-write tests. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180719193944.ifljmnoxmrigs75h@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbenchread-write tests. (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbenchread-write tests.
Re: Possible performance regression in version 10.1 with pgbench read-write tests. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-Jul-19, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:03 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> seeing futex in the call stack andres suggested that following commit could > >> be the reason for regression > >> > >> commit ecb0d20a9d2e09b7112d3b192047f711f9ff7e59 > >> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > >> Date: 2016-10-09 18:03:45 -0400 > >> > >> Use unnamed POSIX semaphores, if available, on Linux and FreeBSD. > > Hmm. So that commit might not have been the greatest idea. > > It appears so. I think we should do something about it as the > regression is quite noticeable. So the fix is just to revert the change for the linux makefile? Sounds easy enough, code-wise. Do we need more evidence that it's harmful? Since it was changed in pg10 not 11, I don't think this is an open-item per se. (Maybe an "older bug", if we must really have it there.) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: