Re: automatic restore point
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: automatic restore point |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180711063336.GB14301@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: automatic restore point ("Yotsunaga, Naoki" <yotsunaga.naoki@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: automatic restore point
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 06:11:01AM +0000, Yotsunaga, Naoki wrote: > I want to hear about the following in addition to the previous > comment. What would you do if your customer dropped the table and asked you to > restore it? I can think of 4 reasons on top of my mind: 1) Don't do that. 2) Implement safe-guards using utility hooks or event triggers. 3) Have a delayed standby if you don't believe that your administrators are skilled enough in case. 4) Have backups and a WAL archive. > Everyone is thinking what to do to avoid operation failure, but I’m > thinking about after the user’s failure. > What I mean is that not all users will set up in advance. > For example, if you make the settings described in the manual, you > will not drop the table by operation failure. However, not all users > do that setting. > For such users, I think that it is necessary to have a function to > easily restore data after failing operation without setting anything > in advance. So I proposed this function. Well, if you put in place correct measures from the start you would not have problems. It seems to me that there is no point in implementing something which is a solution for a very narrow case, where the user has shot his own foot to begin with. Having backups anyway is mandatory by the way, standby replicas are not backups. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: