Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180703015439.dqtkhmssnbn4ldkg@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2018-07-02 21:50:36 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2018-Jul-02, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > Andres suggested back in March (and again privately to me) that given how > > much this has changed from the original this CF item should be marked > > Returned With Feedback and the current patchset submitted as a new item. > > > > Does anyone object to that course of action? > > If doing that makes the "CF count" reset back to one for the new > submission, then I object to that course of action. If we really > think this item does not belong into this commitfest, lets punt it to > the next one. However, it seems rather strange to do so this early in > the cycle. Is there really no small item that could be cherry-picked > from this series to be committed standalone? Well, I think it should just have been RWFed last cycle. It got plenty of feedback. So it doesn't seem that strange to me, not to include it in the "mop-up" CF? Either way, I don't feel strongly about it, I just know that I won't have energy for the topic in this CF. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: