Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180623021741.GA21575@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:28:58PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 12:34 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > What we don't want to do is to add a bunch of sharding-specific code > > without knowing which workloads it benefits, and how many of our users > > will actually use sharding. Some projects have it done that, and it > > didn't end well since they then had a lot of product complexity with > > little user value. > > Key features from my perspective: > *) fdw in parallel. how do i do it today? ghetto implemented parallel > queries with asynchronous dblink Andres has outlined what needs to be done here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180525033538.6ypfwcqcxce6zkjj%40alap3.anarazel.de > *) column store This could be part of the plugable storage engine. > *) automatic partition management through shards Yes, but I am afraid we need to know where we are going before we can implement management. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: