Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180620035904.GB19346@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README
Re: Add necessary package list to ldap TAP's README |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 06:45:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I was a bit disturbed that you'd push information that was "just guessed", >>> so I went and tried to run the ldap tests on a couple different platforms. > >> I assumed they were guessed at and at least the URLs checked out. >> Should we remove the patch? Yes, I was a bit surprised to see this patch pushed without checks about what I guessed. I am not a user of those other platforms. > No, but it needs some adjustments. I'll go fix what I checked. c992dca2 did not change anything about ldap packages. Are the ones listed for RHEL and FreeBSD correct? > Do you have an opinion on what to say about build-time vs test-time > requirements? It could be an idea to mention that for those test suites Postgres needs to be built with the appropriate --enable-XXX switches or they are just skipped silently. Something in each README files across the lines is an idea: "This test suite requires PostgreSQL to be built with the configure argument --enable-XXX or they are entirely skipped". -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: