Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180512153011.4yjbwkbo3bpbqpdd@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Amit Langote wrote: > +1 to this more radical overhaul of this part of the documentation. Thanks. I pushed now after some more tweaking, including your suggested corrections. I removed the examples, because they were both wrong. We can give this more polish if anybody has the energy, but I think we're in a pretty decent place now. I'm not convinced that we need to show so much detail on pruning as proposed by Robert elsewhere; we didn't have a lot of detail for exclusion either and I don't have any evidence that it was a terrible problem for users. Also, one possible use of the new GUC is that you can compare plans if you so wish. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: